Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by Kunectdots
oneill
#1

Okay, gun fetish folks, tell those 20 dead elementary school children at Sandy Hook School in Newtown, CT. why you think everyone should be packing firearms!

Yeah, IThink, Stickhauler, Rockman1, Kunect, and all the NRA stooges out there, tell us why it's all the "fault" of President Obama and all the "nasty liberals" who want some civilized controls over the unlimited possession and use of firearms in this crazy country! Make my day! HAPPY HOLIDAYS!

 
 

Member Comments

Kunectdots

Right on, Random!

BTW - Colt and Bushmaster AR-15's (one of each) available at South Parkersburg, WV Walmart tonight.

Posted 6 hours ago.

RANDOM21

I don't limit the number of words they post, why should they be able to limit the number of rounds I put in a magazine?

Posted 10 hours ago.

Kunectdots

"MB Studio Productions High Capacity Magazine PSA"

h ttp://ww w.youtube.c om/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7F1nPSNnaBo

Posted 1 day ago.

“In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Conn., Gallup finds 58% of Americans in favor of strengthening the laws covering the sale of firearms, up from 43% in 2011.”

* * *

Americans Want Stricter Gun Laws, Still Oppose Bans

by Lydia Saad

(gallup)

Posted 13 days ago.

“Gallup polling shows Americans are not prepared to relinquish their Second Amendment rights, as majorities reject banning the possession of handguns by civilians, or even outlawing the manufacture or possession of certain "semi-automatic guns known as assault rifles"; but they are clearly more open to further restricting the sale of guns, including with more background checks and bans on high-capacity magazines.”

In U.S., 38% Dissatisfied and Want Stricter Gun Laws

by Lydia Saad

(gallup)

Posted 13 days ago.

harryanderson

I didn't mean to infer that you disagree with Jesus. In fact, I believe you try hard to agree with Jesus. I wrote that comment before I saw your comment about exercise. I have to admit that I greatly enjoy cycling, and that enjoyment has as much to do with my choice as any social responsibility. Plain old thrift also plays a factor.

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oops

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lighten up harry, no need to paint me as disagreeing with Jesus, just saying its good exercise.

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lighten up harry, no need to paint me as disagreeing with Jesus, just saying its good exercise.

Posted 14 days ago.

harryanderson

You may think my efforts insignificant, but I believe Jesus Christ would disagree with you. He said, “You have been faithful over a few things; I will make you ruler over many things.”

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its good exercise harry, help you live longer.

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's it, lets find a way to make volcanos erupt, and offset global warming. You solved it myth nice job. Sarcasm off.

Posted 14 days ago.

harryanderson

“Keep riding your bike carpooling or whatever makes you feel like you are saving the earth from disaster.”

Thank you for reminding us that I take personal responsibility, which I believe is one of the bedrock principles of conservatism.

Posted 14 days ago.

harryanderson

I sure do remember the ozone depletion debate, and I’m glad you brought that up because it’s relevant to the current misinformation campaign waged by those who reject the findings of 97% of the world’s climate scientists. Let’s review.

In 1974, chemists Sherry Rowland and Mario Molina warned that CFCs could attack the protective ozone layer.

Even though the scientific community widely accepted their conclusions, politicians, bean counters, and industrial spokespeople mounted a large public misinformation campaign. These skeptics loudly proclaimed that economic disaster would occur if we phased out CFCs.

Then, in 1987, discovery of an actual “ozone hole” led to widespread acceptance of scientists’ findings, and CFCs were phased out.

There was no economic disaster.

And I believe we can also address anthropogenic CO2 without economic disaster. Thanks for bringing this up.

Posted 14 days ago.

mythravere

Actually a volcano eruption especially a big one would cool the planet. In fact they have before. Just look up the Year without a Summer.

If that comment is meant to insinuate that a volcanic eruption would mitigate a person's attempt at emitting less greenhouse gases by way of adding extra warmth. Then that shows you are ignorant of climate science. Which in turns points further to your position being the result of political expediency.

If thats the case how in the world do you feel free being so constrained by the party you make home to go along with the rest of the flock?

Posted 14 days ago.

burningdownthehouse

What rights are you having stolen from you ithink/tiredofit?

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Believe what you want to. I am not trying to convince you of my position, just explaining my skepticism. Keep riding your bike carpooling or whatever makes you feel like you are saving the earth from disaster. One volcano eruption will wipe out a million years of your efforts.

Posted 14 days ago.

Tiredofit

Remember the hole in the ozone?

Posted 14 days ago.

ww w.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

Posted 14 days ago.

ww w.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment

Posted 14 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or