Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
67 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
Ithink
#1

Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

It is incredible that democrats keep blathering about Romney lying, when we have the shock and disgust of seeing the president and his administration lying to us about the security of Americans. Unbelievable .

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

“I was in that Benghazi hearing,” she told WND. “I think the Obama administration is desperate to spin Benghazi, and they can’t. I think they saved this story up for a day like today so that conservatives would focus on this admission.”

Posted 528 days ago.

mythravere

They seem to have gotten so good at scandal alchemy that they don’t know what to do when someone hands them solid gold. When handed a real conspiracy, they instead are building a new conspiracy on top of it that dismissies the old one.

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted 528 days ago.

mythravere

For some of Obama’s biggest and most imaginative critics, the abundance of scandal stinks to high heaven and suggests the White House is intentionally downing itself in controversy — for some reason. Jon Stewart predicted the IRS scandal would confirm every anti-Obama conspiracy theory out there, but instead, Michele Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, and Alex Jones smell a rat about the scandals, themselves (call it a meta-conspiracy). Continued next post

Posted 528 days ago.

Disprove it Betsy.

If you can.

Posted 528 days ago.

"So on one hand they are/might be overstepping their bounds and on another they aint doing their job."

I still don’t see information about churches and religious groups violating tax exempt status but for the sake of conversation, let’s suppose they are. Hypothetically speaking, if churches and religious organizations are acting in a manner that violates their tax exempt status and the IRS were to remove that status, should then money donated to the organization become tax deductible?

Posted 528 days ago.

What I saw was a claim by one liberal stating he was targeted for his political beliefs. Sorry dude but that proves nothing.

As for revenues, I’ll try to dumb this down so that even you can understand it. There is no story to cite stating that our revenue increased 50% because I did not find that information in a story. Unlike you, I do not need talking points handed to me with my opinion attached because without direction I’m lost. I find information an form my own opinion. I know that is a foreign concept to you but it’s called intelligence.

I know revenue increased 50%, from about $1.85 trillion in 2001 to $2.8 trillion on 2013 because I found the information on my own. It’s out there, go look and stop crying about proof. At this point, you have 3 choices. You can either accept the truth and move on, you can try and prove it wrong or you can continue crying about proof and confirm just how unintelligent you truly are.

Anything else?

Posted 528 days ago.

moderation

not so, tiredofit.

Posted 528 days ago.

mythravere

So on one hand they are/might be overstepping their bounds and on another they aint doing their job.

Only in America.

Posted 528 days ago.

mythravere

Heres the kicker. The IRS isn't touching the church issue. At least like it should.

Posted 528 days ago.

I seem to recall the republicans going after a few democratic leaning churches not too many years ago.

Prove it

Posted 529 days ago.

So why ain't Holder going after the churches? You reckon hes too busy looking at tax returns and phone records?

Posted 529 days ago.

mythravere

Something else you wont see on Fox and The Blaze. Churches and religious groups violating the rules of their tax exempt status.

You know breaking the law and all.

Posted 529 days ago.

I would tend to agree with Tired, all Al Qaeda has done is relocate, which is what we should do, out of the Middle East. If Jesus couldn't bring peace there, what makes an American President think he can.

Posted 529 days ago.

mythravere

I'm sorry but what was said about operation Iraqi Freedom not too long after it had been started?

Mission Accomplished? When it clearly wasn't.

Lol!!!!!

Posted 529 days ago.

harryanderson

I'd say al Queada has been "on the run" since Sept. 12, 2001.

Posted 529 days ago.

I don't know that it would meant less votes for Obama or more conservatives coming out (that's ther real reason Romney lost but that's another conversation) but the fact is, the American voter should have known. And even at that, I don't know if it would have made a difference but still...

As while Obama never specifically stated terrorism had been defeated (can you defeat a slogan) he certainly implied that it had on numerous occasions, including the Foreign Affairs debate. He did specifically state numerous times that he had Al Qaeda on the run and that he was responsible for OBL’s death.

He’s an arrogant one, willing to take credit on anything good but everything bad is always someone else’s fault. At least Nixon had the stones to stand up and take responsibility. I guess this guy is no Dick Nixon.

Posted 529 days ago.

harryanderson

And I agree “that sooner or later more will come out despite what Obama apologist say.”

Posted 529 days ago.

harryanderson

Aaron, I think I see what you mean. Are you speculating that fewer voters might have chosen Obama if Gen. Petraeus had, before the election, “countered the Presidents line policy win, the killing if OBL and the subsequent defeat of terrorism”?

Like many speculations, that can cut both ways. More voters might have chosen Obama if Gen. Patraeus had, before the election, countered the narrative that the talking points had a political motive.

Unprovable speculations aside, I’d like to address another part of your statement by asking when Obama said that bin Laden’s death led to “the subsequent defeat of terrorism.”

I don’t recall Obama saying terrorism had been defeated. I do recall him saying that Al Qaeda’s “core” had been “degraded.”

Posted 529 days ago.

Benghazi was home to rebel forces in 2010, many of which fought against Americans for years in both Iraq and Afghanistan that sought to overthrow Gaddafi and end his 40 year reign of power. Despite their background, our CIA aided those rebels in their overthrow of Gaddafi from the American Consulate in Benghazi.

According to one Senator on the Sunday Morning talk shows, the SD felt like Benghazi was a CIA outpost thus they were responsible for protection and security. After the attack, when the CIA started blaming State, saying they had given numerous warnings and requested increased security, State essentially said, it’s your baby, you deal with it.

Given the fact that CIA used the Consulate to aid the Libyan Civil War and the number of attacks leading up to 9/11/12, there is much more to this story. The more I read about this situation, the more I’m convinced that sooner or later more will come out despite what Obama apologist say.

Posted 529 days ago.

mythravere

And now we have the AP being put under DOJ scrutiny by having their phone communications monitored.

Not much of a surprise really considering the surveillance apparatus that has taken hold since 9-11.

Posted 529 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or