Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

your*

you sure sound mad Bro.

all you whining and useless name calling.

facts really get you conservatives all a twitter. it is nice to see you parse down the trifecta of trolls though.

Any other emails you conservatives wish to forge to get to your imaginary ends?

Am I mad? Not in the least. I rather enjoy when I interact with people like you and I get to show them for what that are.

You say I'm wrong on the revenue increase but you've offered no numbers to counter my statement.

Why is that Scooter. Make it a good one because I'm putting your responses on a couple of sites. So far they think you're funnier then armature night at the Appolo.

They got "busted" changing the same emails they are whining about. see how that gotcha politics works when you create an issue where there was none.

not that the partisan hit patrol of the conservative movement will care, eh libertarian?

you mad bro?

better look at that chart again, you'll notice that your 50% is not in fact true.

Revenue in 2001 versus 2013. Put up or shut up time Skippy.

What were they busted for Scooter. Naming the agencies involved? A Republican congressman put 'State Department' and 'CIA' where the emails had 'they' and 'the agency.'

That's real damming compared to months of Obama lies. Now quit changing the subject, running like the b**** you are and address the facts that you link confirmed.

Or continue to squirm like the ***** you are!!!!!

What were they busted for Scooter. Naming the agencies involved? A Republican congressman put 'State Department' and 'CIA' where the emails had 'they' and 'the agency.'

That's real damming compared to months of Obama lies. Now quit changing the subject, running like the b**** you are and address the facts that you link confirmed.

Or continue to squirm like the ***** you are!!!!!

the rightists sure did get quiet on bengazi after they got busted changing the email stream.

those poor little theocrats of the right, they just can't help but trip over their d***s

What then were the revenues in 2001, what are they in 2013 and what is the increase?

I don't believe you can say because I don't think you're smart enough to read the chart.

I disagree with your chart assessment.

In other news, what a neat turn of events.

"Republicans Altered Benghazi Emails, CBS News Report Claims"

Your link is a picture of a chart that says exactly what I've been saying for a week you d***a**, i******, moron. Your picture begins in 2002 with revenues slightly below the 2 trillion mark, which I believe 1.9 trillion is and shows 2013 well above the 3 trillion mark (my numbers use a more conservative estimate of 2.7 trillion) thus what you’ve provided evidence of is an increase that is GREATER than the 50% I stated. Seriously dude, I don’t mean to be rude and I’m not trying to put you down but you’re really not very smart, are you?

As for the link from the Congresswoman, it’s an interesting PowerPoint. Highly misleading but interesting. I’m not surprised that have that as a talking point. I just wish you were smart enough understand it and carry on intelligent conversation regarding the contents.

One issue. It claims that unemployment is down, which is true for the U3 number but it makes no mention of the more important U6 number. Why?

well, fix the spaces and it opens just fine. you are smart enough to use excel, certainly you can figure it out.

can't help but notice from your idiotic screed, you didn't mention the other link.

you still haven't shown jack to your statement of "50% increase in revenue" FOS comes to mind.

I'm still not getting your point scooter. You disagree with my statement that revenues have increased 50% over the past dozen years and cry like at 8!+@h for days DEMANDING I PROVE my claim. When I do, you add more 8!+@h crying about how you’re not smart enough to use Excel because it's too difficult for you to point and click thus you demand I copy and paste the information. I do that and now you’re still 8!+@h crying about lord knows what and you cap that by trying to add links to a site that you claim disproves my claim, even though it supports it if you have an IQ above 3, don’t spend all day 8!+@h crying and have a clue what you’re talking about. And you still have no point.

So if revenues have not increased by 50% over the past dozen years, then pray tell Scooter8!+@hcrierburningwithaleberalfeevercantthinkforyourself Betsy, how much have they increased by? Think you can figure that one out without wetting your keyboard from all your 8!+@h crying?

Three things scooter.

One, neither chart opens, even when closing the gaps on the ****. Just list the link without any breaks and I can figure out the * in the link.

2, I've used the site you tried to link, usgovernmentrevenue****. It's not a good site because it's hard to get information into easily searchable formats. Even so, if one knows how to use the site, they can find that doesn't disagree with me. 2001 shows total Federal revenue of 1.9 trillion dollars. 2013 shows estimated revenue is 2.7 trillion for a difference of .8 trillion. That’s a 50% increase DA.

3, I just left my 3 year old granddaughters house and she was showing me a game she’s playing that teachers her math. It’s an Excel based spreadsheet and she was navigating it perfectly. And she’s 3. Her 84 year old GG Grandmother was there and she navigated it as well. That made me think of you and just how dense one has to be in this day and age to not be able to open a spread sheet.

Baaaaahaaa

ht tp://sewell.house. gov/sites/sewell.house.gov/files/images/US%20Economy%20in%20Charts-%20February%202012.pdf

this chart begs to differ on your 50% increase.

ht tp://www .usgovernmentrevenue. com/usgs_line.php?title=Total Revenue&units=b&size=m&year=2002_2013&sname=US&bar=1&stack=1&col=c&legend=&source=a_a_a_a_a_a_a_a_b_b_b_b&spending0=1853.14_1782.31_1880.11_2153.61_2406.87_2567.98_2523.99_2104.99_2165.12_2567.18_2926.40_3188.12

I have no use for spreadsheets, you keeping those ****** sales straight are ya?

still calling ********e of your claim of 50% increase in revenue tired/ithink/aaron.

that sissy Bush sure wouldn't go into Pakistan to kill terrorists.

Si,of course I read.it, tiredofit.

Also part of the speech, mod. did you read the whole thing or just cherry pick what you wanted.