Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
62 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
Ithink
#1

Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

It is incredible that democrats keep blathering about Romney lying, when we have the shock and disgust of seeing the president and his administration lying to us about the security of Americans. Unbelievable .

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

This discussion depresses me.

We aren't talking about how to improve in the future. We aren't discussing whether changes have been made since last September.

This whole sad discussion revolves around who benefits politically instead of what policy choices will best protect Americans abroad.

We're tearing at the throats of our fellow Americans, and our infighting benefits the intractable enemies we have sworn to destroy us.

As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."

Posted 530 days ago.

RANDOM21

The cuts were to FUTURE funding that had already been increased to record amounts in previous years and was being spent to provide Chevy Volts and other green trinkets to consulates around the world and there was plenty of funds available but never spent on Mid east consulate protection.

Posted 530 days ago.

mythravere

Technically speaking of bush has nothing to do with this. But when pointing out republican hypocrisy and double standards it does.

Posted 530 days ago.

mythravere

Facts absolutely do not matter to the right. They've got an agenda of taking back "their" country. They'll do just about whatever it takes.

Posted 530 days ago.

mythravere

You ever seen those 9-11-01 bumper stickers that says " never forget". I never will and all responsible should be brought to justice.

Posted 530 days ago.

mythravere

I don't know or care if he said that. The simple fact is that this issue would not be an issue under a republican presidency. At least republicans wouldn't be up in arms about it no where near as much.

According to the right Obama is responsible for three deaths under his leadership. Ok I'll buy that.

Time for the bush regime to pay the butcher bill for 3000 deaths UNDER THIER leadership.

If Obama can be brought down for this then Bush and his cronies should face the same treatment.

Nothing ever happened to them.

WHY!

Posted 530 days ago.

One more thing Myth. You claim the right is going after President Obama on Benghazi. Correct me if I'm wrong (I rarely am) but isn't that what President Obama instructed those who have questions regarding that faithful day do last November. Didn't he say to leave the woman who lied about the film alone, not to blame Hillary or the State department and to instead focus their attention on him?

Posted 530 days ago.

Myth stated "You folks got a seething hatred for Obama and the left."

That was followed by Moderation claiming that that "Dubya was never deposed..."

So who is it again Myth that has a seething hatred? Like I said, the extreme left and the extreme right are polar opposites that will do anything they can to destroy the other including lying for one of their own. If Democrats in Congress had any honor, they would want to get to the bottom of Benghazi as much as Republicans do, regardless of the motive.

Moderation stated that GWB “most certainly would have lied….” I wonder when everything is going to stop being Bush’s fault. When is Obama going to step up and take responsibilities for his own actions?

And finaly, yes Myth, Sandy Hook was most certainly expolited.

Posted 530 days ago.

RANDOM21

This statement wraps it up nicely.."According to media accounts, "various" military actions were considered and rejected, leaving the Americans in Benghazi on their own. In retrospect, there were no "optimum" actions for the situation in Benghazi, but the U.S. was not without options. Of course, it became more difficult to reach a consensus after the Commander-in-Chief went to bed, before the battle was over." ***.formerspook.blogspot.***/2012/10/options-in-benghazi.html

Posted 530 days ago.

Tiredofit, I'll try to remember that your IP address has a "no trespassing" sign. lol

I seriously doubt if we even live in the same county.

Posted 530 days ago.

moderation

Dubya was never deposed to reveal his incompetence in the pre 9-11 scenario. he most certainly would have lied about having received critical intel warning of a terrorist attack.

Posted 530 days ago.

"But is this investigation about righting a wrong or about destroying Obama politically? It's not about righting a wrong."

While I agree the motivation for many on the right may very well be political, can the same not be said about the left in 72-74, 85-87 and the entire Presidency of GWB or the right during Bill Clinton's term? We've become a nation of polarizing opposites and the only reason one side has to go after the other so fervently on issues like Benghazi is because the other is not willing to concede one of their own committed any act of wrongdoing.

The story here is not that the right is trying to crucify Obama for Benghazi; it is that Americans died in Benghazi and it appears that at least some of those deaths could have been prevented were it not for a stand down order. What sickens me are those on the left willing to dismiss those deaths out of political gamesmanship, and for what, to protect the person who gave that order?

Why?

Posted 530 days ago.

It's amazing that someone still mentions the Bush working trips to his home in Texas. Most all presidents had a home where they worked.

Obama is king of the golf courses.

Posted 530 days ago.

Why did they gather intelligence? The CIA and FBI couldn't share info. Remember Clinton's Jamie Gorelick's rules? No, of course you don't.

Posted 531 days ago.

The same IP,huh? You can't be as nutty as you seem.

Posted 531 days ago.

moderation

ithink- bush met with the heads of those pertinent agencies/ people. do ya think he just didn't hear the warnings, or could it be he was thinking about his next vacation? You know, a displacement activity.

Posted 531 days ago.

moderation

The bush admin. would not listen to the voices who were delegated by this government to .... gather intelligence of terrorist activities and report to the executive officer.

Posted 531 days ago.

Sorry for the extra words. I do better with my big pc.

Clnton had already had the Trade Center bombed on his watch ,plus other attacks.

Posted 531 days ago.

moderation

. What does the gun debate have to do with the lost lives associated with the Benghazi issue,tiredofit ? Perhaps it is a matter of dementia, and not your iq that is responsible for that post.

Posted 531 days ago.

Bush had been in office 7 months on 911. It took forever to get his administration officials confirmed, because the dems were still hung up on hanging chads.

The terrorists had learned to fly right under Clinton's nose. There had already been several terrorist attacks and Clinton treated them like domestic crimes, just like obama.

Clinton's nose. Remember th Trade CEnter

Posted 531 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or