Who Lied About the Attack on 9/11/12?

Table 1.3—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-) in Current Dollars, Constant (FY 2005) Dollars, and as Percentages of GDP: 1940–2018

really?

I don't use XLS.

give us a quote to your 50% increase in revenue.

*****it Richard.

I'm sorry Betsy, I assumed you could use Google. My bad. Fiscal Year 2001 1,991.1 2013 2,712.0

Source: Office of Management and Budget, Historical Tables, Table 1.3; ***********whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ (last accessed May 7, 2013).

Hush Nancy

"When Patraeus said the change was for “intelligence, not political reasons,” that impressed me."

I’m not so sure. Between the timing of Patraeus’ testimony and the fact that the Obama Administration sent Susan Rice out to lie on the Sunday Morning talk shows tells me that there’s more to this than meets the eye. Initially, I thought it was because Obama didn’t want to acknowledge the fact that Al Qaeda was still operational despite his asserting otherwise for political reasons dealing with the election but now I’m not so sure.

After hearing a Senator yesterday on the talk show circuit claim the change in talking points was a result of inter-agency infighting, it added to my belief that someone is trying to cover something big up. I’m just not sure exactly what it was. But the fact that this was a CIA base in a recent overthrown country as part of the Arab Spring on 9/11 leads me to believe that this indeed could be 1985 all over again.

Time will tell.

As I said before....Bengazi is a FLOP. can the conservatives waste anymore money investigating nothing and re voting to repeal Obamacare?

one of their split personalities can't list the freedoms they whine about being stolen, one uses the circle jerk to show their "facts" and the other can't list on citation on their claim of revenues rising 50% since 2001.

the men,? one boy hiding behind 3 names is more like it.

If we want the opinion of a nancyboy, well let ya know.

Shhhh Scotty the MEN are talking.

still no citation from the trifecta of trolls.

figures.

Harry, everyone needs a little encouragement to bring their dialogue into focus. And the word hate just isn't becoming of you.

I recall MYTH how the left supported the second Bush term eh? Sometimes you are so blind to your own hypocrisy

Aaron, the “talking points” thing angered me at first, but that initial anger abated after David Patraeus testified.

“Gen Petraeus told the lawmakers that references to terror groups were removed from the final version of the administration's ‘talking points’ on Benghazi, although he was not sure which federal agency deleted it.

“Democrats said the former CIA director made clear the change was made for intelligence, not political reasons.”

ww w.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20362941

I realize that these Democrats’ political agenda moved them to claim that Patreaus (whose testimony wasn’t public) said the editing wasn’t politically motivated. I believed these Democrats because neither Republicans with the opposite agenda nor Gen. Patraeus disputed the Democrats’ claim.

When Patraeus said the change was for “intelligence, not political reasons,” that impressed me.

The Benghazi issue is just the continuation of the make Obama a one term president plan.

Aaron likes to point out my extreme dislike for the right. But it goes both ways.

The right with absolute conviction hates Obama.

The way they conduct their political business proves that.

Oh and for the record I've been posting on these forums a lot longer than you Aaron.

Nobody twisted your arm to make you respond to me did they.

So why did you waddle on in here and start posting.

Apparently I've pushed some buttons?

So how about this. Just ignore my posts!

LOL! Its real easy.

"Mod, I know I'm pushing all the right buttons when multiple posters respond to my comments."

"I mean after all, do you really think there are people who value your opinion?

Come on man!!!!!!"

Apparently to some degree you do. After all why would an intelligent person bother responding to an idiot such as myself?

Come on man!!!!!

Aaron, I hope you wont be too disappointed, do you recall the landing under sniper fire lie of dear Hilary??? She was absolutely shown as a complete liar and she dern near pulled of the DNC nomination. If it were not for race she would have easily.

There’s a new poll that supports what you said, tiredofit.

“While voters overall may think Congress' focus should be elsewhere there's no doubt about how mad Republicans are about Benghazi. 41% say they consider this to be the biggest political scandal in American history to only 43% who disagree with that sentiment. Only 10% of Democrats and 20% of independents share that feeling. Republicans think by a 74/19 margin than Benghazi is a worse political scandal than Watergate, by a 74/12 margin that it's worse than Teapot Dome, and by a 70/20 margin that it's worse than Iran Contra.”

Voters overall aren’t moved, Republicans think it’s the worst, and Democrats think it’s the least.

ww w.publicpolicypolling.c om/main/2013/05/voters-trust-clinton-over-gop-on-benghazi.html

Originally I didn't think this thing would take hold. Now I'm not so sure, perhaps not with Obama but I do think it will be an issue in the future. If Hillary runs in 2016, I'm sure her "who cares" testimony will come back to haunt her.

"I hate put-downs."

I don't worry about it Harry. When the mods of the world have to resort to comments like that, I know the debate is over as they have nothing else.