Mobile Version: mobile.newsandsentinel.com
 
RSS:
Parkersburg Weather Forecast, WV (26101)
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUse.com Web
Business  Local News  Obituaries  Sports  Community information  Ads  Jobs  Polls  Blogs  CU Galleries  Contact us
News

Animal Control Task Force turns over report

Cat licensing among measures recommended

By PAMELA BRUST pbrust@newsandsentinel.com
POSTED: February 9, 2010

PARKERSBURG - The Wood County Commission-appointed Task Force on Dog and Animal Control recommended cat licensing, expanding dog fees, as well as providing additional education and training on animal control issues.

The commissioners said they recently received copies of the report. Task force members included Lee Buckingham, board treasurer for the Humane Society of Parkersburg; Rob Sims, deputy animal control officer with the Wood County Sheriff's Office; Wood County Prosecutor Jason Wharton; Tracy Newberry, Parkersburg Parks Department; Norm Harris, Vienna Parks director; Williamstown City Councilman Paul Jordan; Ralph Blair, president Wood County Farm Bureau; Bob Buchanan, West Virginia University Extension Office, and Dennis Cain, representing the county commission. The report was signed by all the members except Jordan.

In September, commissioners asked the task force to develop ideas for plans, policies and infrastructure to enable residents to achieve the county's goals for animal control services based on code. The county is required to provide services relating to the control of dogs and has traditionally contracted with the Humane Society of Parkersburg to provide those services. The task force was asked to review existing code, make suggestions for programs that would minimize cost to the community; look at the relationship between the humane society and support units; control of excess, and unwanted animals; county-run and other alternatives for facilities used in other locations versus humane society-operated facilities; cost of five days care plus euthanize; cost of humane officers; average costs of additional care, and to suggest programs in addition to state code to benefit the community, and associated costs.

The report was broken into short- and long-term recommendations.

"I personally thought the task force study was pretty insightful and overviewish. They studied three different counties and looked at issues here, and they basically decided we have a pretty good situation here and we should be working with the humane society as much as we can. It was their feeling we shouldn't build our own facility, if we could work with the humane society," said Commissioner Wayne Dunn.

"In the long-term, they are recommending some changes in the state code, like implementing a cat license fee and addressing the dog fee. A lot of this, long-term, has to be solved with the state. I've talked with (Delegate) Dan Poling already about it, and he is very receptive, whatever needs to be submitted, once we decide what we want to do," Dunn said.

Dunn said he wanted the report to go out to other counties and other humane societies to spur discussion statewide.

"I'll also contact the County Commissioners' Association; get on the agenda. We need to try and educate people. One of the recommendations is for more education. The solution is not that difficult, if we just get started. By raising the fees that would also help create additional revenue for the humane society too," Dunn noted.

Commission President Rick Modesitt had no comment on the task force report.

"I've read through the report once, I'm going through it again, and looking forward to finding solutions for the animal control problems in the county," Commissioner Blair Couch said.

"The primary problems are the result of over-population and lack of funding," according to the report.

The task force recommended commissioners decide whether they want to continue funding the humane society's costs associated with the care and disposition of cats. For the long-term, the group recommended a fee be imposed on cat owners.

It was recommended the commission provide funds, possibly through grants, to develop a public animal control presentation for public education covering the problems, duties of officers, benefits of spaying/neutering, adoption of dogs and other animal control issues. The task force also recommended additional training for animal control officers, including search and seizure laws and customer service.

The commissioners were also advised to work closely with the Save A Kitty nonprofit Feral Cat Program and pursue cost-effective options to increase awareness and dog license collections. There was also a recommendation the commission seek legislative support to "update and expand the fee schedules for dogs and other animal control," including addition of a cat fee and a differential fee scale based on whether an animal is spayed or neutered.

The county is operating under the service terms of last year's contract after agreeing to pay the humane society an additional $21,972 on the existing contract to assure the agency would continue providing afterhours animal control services through June 30, 2010. The county and municipalities were notified, as of July, the society would cease providing those services, and the commissioners met with several private companies about employing them to perform afterhours services before reaching agreement with the humane society.

The county funds the humane society partially out of the general county fund and partially from the assessor's office dog tag fund. The additional money for the existing contract came from the county's cash carryover.

The society has also warned the county effective July 1, 2010, it would cease all animal control services for governmental entities if additional funds were not forthcoming. Between all the governmental entities, officials said nearly $200,000 is paid to the humane society for the services.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-16 | Post a comment
Geezer
02-11-10 5:09 AM
I'm starting a chapter of Save-a-Coyote. Anyone have any cats they want to donate?

JamesW
02-10-10 12:16 PM
To continue what I started, I hope that people in other parts of the state are keyed in on this, as when you read it, they are wanting the state to raise the dog tag fee>

More taxes equals more animals for the humane society to deal with and kill. People are trying to make it, and the last thing anyone needs is new taxess.

Why don't the animal control officers enforces laws ALREADY ON THE BOOKS - you know like, the leash laws? Stuff like that... And why don't they go after dog fighters?

I tell you why...its easy to go after a poor elderly person who cannot afford a meaningless tax on their dogs.

The big boys want to play like they are real men, and fine a law abiding citizen, but to do something about real problems like animal abuse or dog fighting take what they have not got - real ability to investigate things, courage, and intelligence!

Yep, lets make it harder by making it more expensive for people to share their lives with a pet. Brilliant recommendation, bri

JamesW
02-10-10 12:11 PM
In an economy where people are losing everything they have, this group of brilliant people want to raise the cost of having perhaps the last thing in the world that means anything to some?

What in the heck do responsible, law abiding people have to do with the reason that animals are picked up anyway? Why should we pay for actions of a few idiots who cause problems?

Don't tell me that licenses help return pets, thats bull.. Then why bother to encourage microchips? Tags do the same!

Keep a tag on a cat? Ha! And what does an indoor cat who never goes out have to do with all the unwanted kittens that go to the shelter anyway? The purpose of license for dogs was to create a fund to pay farmers back when packs of wild dogs killed their livestock.

If the shelter wanted to do something, they would read the book "Redemption" by Nathan Winograd and become a true no kill shelter.

My neutered 15 year old dog is NOT the problem, nor is my indoor only neutered cat!

MaeLeeWV
02-09-10 9:58 PM
Hello Catman57, good to see you on here again. I recently took in 4 stray cats and I am getting them fixed. I have 2 more to go. As far as feeding them Observer, I don't see how that encourages them to breed. I feed all sorts of stray animals in my area because I don't have the heart to let them starve, and I will continue feeding them as long as I am alive.

Observer
02-09-10 5:47 PM
I would be in favor of a 'no tether' ordinance. The ordinance bans chaining your dog to a box, but as far as I know that hasn't been proposed in this area. Huntington enacted the ordinance last year.

People feeding feral cats just encourages the cats to breed. Capture them instead, and adopt them out to responsible owners. We definitely don't need more feral cats, but they are still being well fed and are breeding like rabbits. Maybe if I feed them, they will do their business on someone elses property instead.

When they pee on the front door.. well it just stinks.

sassey
02-09-10 3:15 PM
Just what we need, more taxes. I've rescued 4 cats, one which was dying, that I nursed back. People drop them off in our neighborhood because they think we are wealthy. I'm trying to make it on social security, that which I've paid into since I was 14 years old. I took all the cats to the vet, got their shots, and had them fixed.(I might add, the humane society didn't offer help at all.) One month of care cost me $600.00-- the vets don't give you a break either. If I had the place and funds, I'd take in every dog and cat I could find and take care of them. At the same time that the cats adopted me, I found a tiny dog that was in really bad shape. Obviously, she had been used in a puppy mill, and when she couldn't produce any more, they turned her out in the streets. She had to have a couple surgical procedures to make it, and turned out to be a wonderful pet. Now the city wants to raise our taxes, and again, no thanks to the Humane society!!!

kandih
02-09-10 2:23 PM
I have to agree that cat licensing is not the answer. With so many feral and free-roaming cats in the Parkersburg area now, it will only create more abandonment by residents who can not afford to sterilize their pets. It also punishes kind residents who are feeding strays and many people who foster cats and kittens waiting for adoption. There are not enough homes for all the cats and kittens who have been allowed to roam freely and reproduce. The answer is affordable sterilization and not permitting your cat to roam without being sterilized. You are basically targeting residents who sterilize their cats or care for homeless cats. Mandatory spay/neuter or cat licensing in communities without affordable, accessible sterilization facilities has a severe impact on low-income residents who are the least likely to have financial resources to pay for sterilization of their animals or pay penalties for not getting them sterilized. If enforced, more residents will abandon their pets.

gooddawg
02-09-10 11:02 AM
the cayotes will take care of the stray cats . maybe not all of them .but some of them . so..you think " no cayotes in parkersburg " think again .they also will carry off small dogs...as far as more fees to payout....we already pay...year after year personal property taxes . which is unfair !! but..you can't get youre license on youre vehicle .if you don't pay it...what can you do about it? NOTHING!! IT'S STRANGE....the more unemployment goes up .the more people you have wanting to take-take-take .

Catman57
02-09-10 10:36 AM
I will GLADLY pay a license fee for each one of my cats--if and when the police department starts fining each and every lawbreaking idiot who illegally parks in Fire Lanes, on sidewalks, in handicap spaces, etc. They're EVERYWHERE and right under their noses, and much more easy to spot than the occasional stray dog or cat!

BfromWV
02-09-10 8:53 AM
I don't think paying a cat license is the answer. Why should I pay a license for cats I feed because the original "owners" gave them the boot. I'm just trying to help the cats out and along the way I have taken a female and a male cat in to be spayed/neutered to try and control the population in my neighborhood. If I had called the Humane Society they would have just took them in and ultimately put them down because they have a huge population of their own. Go after the backyard dog breeders who aren't paying a license fee for all of their dogs. Also for pete sake when the Humane Society gets a call and they go to the people home check and see if they have a license for all their dogs. Trust me I know they don't all the time because I know they were at someones house who have at least six dogs and no license for any of them.

marcellacruella
02-09-10 8:13 AM
Of course you should donate to the Humane Society if you are able to. Just because they don't run right out and grab the dog that gets into your trash, doesn't mean they aren't doing a good job. I do feel that with the loss of their manager Stacy that they will go to pot, since the old director is gone, Michelle, I've heard that their going down hill. Maryanne is doing what she can, but she's in it for her salary...not for the animals. To get back to the original comment, the officers do what they can. If they allow the city to take over, you'll NEVER get those pesky trash mongers out of your neighborhood!

brianda
02-09-10 7:43 AM
Everyone is losing their jobs and barely making it now... When you have been a productive citizen all of your life and economy goes to pot and you have to go on assistance (welfare) to be able to survive. Then they raise the taxes and fees...Isn't that like the state goverment paying itself..???? Also when it comes to the Humane soc. I would not support an organization which we have donated to for years that will not come out and pick up stray dogs running the neighborhood tearing out trash... then they stand at the doors of Sam's clubs or other area store wanting you to donate to them ...forget that....

Finders
02-09-10 6:57 AM
Enough is Enough I Agree with Martie, only I will add are you out of your mind? Raising taxes in what I will call a depression is Political Suicide. Remember all these increases at our next election. I say Vote Them All Out! While your at it Wood County Election Board with this new fangled voting machine can you Please add a button that reads (VOTE THE CURRENT ADMISTRATION OUT OF OFFICE).Im getting a little far sighted with all these new taxes who could afford a pair of glasses.Remember what these elected officals have done for us election day NOTHING. Where are the jobs? Instead of raising taxes bring business to the area-now that would be a positive tax base-Oh I forgot you were busy trying to tax the kittys.Let Rick Modesitt,David Blair Couch,and Wayne Dunn know We Are Not Going To Stand For More Taxes

DILLIGAS
02-09-10 5:45 AM
So now they want me to pay taxes on my cat? K.M.A. Wood county. My cat adds NO burden to Wood county and I WON'T pay taxes on it.

This cat does a great job removing vermin from around the farm. It would be nice if there was a big cat that would remove the vermin from office in Wood County.

Geezer
02-09-10 4:11 AM
The only good thing about cats is they don't bark.

Martie
02-09-10 12:19 AM
Is the local government trying to run people out of the area or what? Raising fees or creating new ones in an area with a depressed economy is NOT the way to keep people here. So, you going to raise the dog licenses, create a cat licence, raise the bridge toll from the local government in addition to the higher gasoline, natural gas, pending increase in electric...when will it end??

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Business  Local News  Obituaries  Sports  Community information  Ads  Jobs  Polls  Blogs  CU Galleries  Contact us