Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Syria

Learning nothing from past mistakes

August 30, 2013

Reports from the White House say an attack against Syria could come soon....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(31)

Guy007

Sep-01-13 10:26 PM

The President's delay by ignoring his power as commander in chief to strike Syria instead of being wishy washy has not only destroyed what credibility he had, but in addition, his weakness as commander in chief has threatened the credibility of this country. GOD HELP US if Congress rejects our rightful approach to strike. Iran and Syria are now screaming "VICTORY" for our president's indeciseveness.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Sep-01-13 6:46 PM

Its like I said before when it comes to Syria, President Obama is dammed if he does and dammed if he don't So his now doing the right thing. Getting Congress involved.

AS for "Parliament handed David Cameron the first no vote on military support Since the Crimean War in the mid 1800's" Fact is, Bush ruined that too! Our allies specifically pointed to the Iraq debacle as reason they hesitate to join in on Syria. And I can't blame them either!

4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

RANDOM21

Sep-01-13 1:45 PM

The POTUS painted himself into a corner and is now trying to use any excuse available to extricate himself from looking like the incompetent fool he has proven to be. He stepped in a deep pile with his "Redline in the Sand" thinking NATO or the UN would back him and lost on both counts. When Parliament handed David Cameron the first no vote on military support Since the Crimean War in the mid 1800's. Obama's only hope lies in Congress which he will blame which ever way the vote goes. It's hard to lead from behind when there is no one in front.

7 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Sep-01-13 11:18 AM

Well you got me "GPettit12" I don't have any idea what you're trying to say

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GPettit12

Sep-01-13 10:45 AM

What is the matter Denver? You cannot think back in 2003? President Bush did get approval from Congress and even better then that the UN as well as the backing of most of the world. Why? The honorable Bush was more respected then Bo is currently. Tell me why Asia and most of Europeand countries do not like Bo? Do not tell me to go look at Google again, how about you experiencing it yourself???!!!!!

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Sep-01-13 8:47 AM

On Saturday President Obama made it clear he does not want to proceed alone, and will seek authorization and support for a limited strike from Congress. Id say this was one of President Obama better moments, showing some real leadership qualities as opposed to launching missiles so he could prove to the World he was the big man on the hill like Bush and "shotgun" Cheney would. Now when our obstructionist, can't agree on anything, congress opts not to strike, they will have to live with that choice. And It's about time, they'll finally be forced into some sort of a decision on something for a change!

Now lets see what they do!

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Toehead

Sep-01-13 7:14 AM

Why is this genocide not the UN's top agenda? If the UN can not get enough votes to respond to Syria's actions why should the United States? It may be time for the U.S. to leave the UN.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GPettit12

Aug-31-13 11:41 PM

Aaron- These people do not understand that the President is NOT the most powerful office in the US Government It is the Congress, they had the exact info of Iraq having WMDs. They along with Britian signed on to go to Iraq NOT for the oil, like some of you dems like to put the spin on what really happen.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AaronS

Aug-31-13 9:21 PM

If President Bush and Cheney lied, why did Hilldog, Jay, Bidden and the other 26 Democrats in the Senate along with Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats who supported the use of force not call President Bush on his lie as they had access to the EXACT same intelligence as the President did? Are you saying they knew Bush lied and did nothing?

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

jarhead99

Aug-31-13 2:20 PM

Well it looks like my next deployment will be to Syria. So did Congress vote on this? I have been out of the loop with no internet. Someone bring me up to speed. Is the Nobel Peace Price recipient meddling in someone else's business?

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Itsnottolate

Aug-31-13 1:48 PM

We have already tried to protect the innocent people and the people we tried to help did not want us there and now, these people are saying they do not want us their as are other nations. The only result will be more killed and disabled soldiers that take on whatever battle the govt tells them to go fight. When the battle starts to engage our allies or us then lets fight but until then let's stay out of it.

3 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Suttle

Aug-31-13 8:44 AM

AaronS...President Bush and Vice President Dick "the torturer" Cheney lied to the American people about the war in Iraq. They knowingly lied to get the USA in a war against a country that posed no threat against us or others. That is a big difference. President G.W. Bush and his side kick Cheney should be charged with war crimes.

9 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Aug-31-13 8:37 AM

Like I wrote, "Thank goodness George W. Bush and Dick "shotgun" Cheney isn't in office now!!!

8 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Aug-31-13 8:22 AM

I agree with "manydemocrats" and "Suttle" that something has to done about the use of chemical weapons. What, I don't know, as long there's no boots on the ground! First lets make sure who is responsible for ordering the chemical attacks. And then go form there.

6 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AaronS

Aug-31-13 1:16 AM

Shuttle, you just made the same argument for Obamas action in Syria that Bush supporters made for him regarding Iraq?

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

GPettit12

Aug-31-13 12:18 AM

I say NO! It is like my younger days when i tell my friends that if we go into the bar for drinks i am NOT going to help them out whenever they get into an argument/ fighting with others. It never fails because I was the one fighting for them. ENOUGH! Lets start taking care of our own people. I have an idea, if we do use our forces let's send Syria the bill to pay for it!

5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Suttle

Aug-31-13 12:03 AM

If the world turns its back on the Syrian people after chemical weapons were used against them, then eventually the use of chemical weapons will be used again against others, including those of us that live in the United States of America. Secretary of State, John Kerry, is right when he says that we cannot let such an insidious act against innocent men, women and children go unpunished. President Obama has a strong record of making sure that evil doers pay a price for their actions.

8 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AaronS

Aug-30-13 11:44 PM

Why must the United States be responsible for holding Assad accountable.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

denver

Aug-30-13 6:40 PM

President Obama said no boots on the ground! Good! As for the Chemical Weapons let's let the Arabs take care of them!

5 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AaronS

Aug-30-13 4:22 PM

"Was there more evidence than that for WMD in Saddam's Iraq?"

According to EVERY National Intelligence Estimate in the world, yes, there was.

Even those who didn't support the use of force like Bob Byrd acknowledged that Iraq had WMD's.

You think maybe he felt that way because the US gave Iraq WMD's in the 1980's?

4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

neocurmudgeon74

Aug-30-13 3:08 PM

tazioli, the word for that isn't "export business," it's "mercenary".

6 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

neocurmudgeon74

Aug-30-13 3:05 PM

"far less evidence." (The Editor).

"less evidence" (AaronS).

Sec. Kerry in his speech this afternoon pointed out that SOMEBODY launched a chemical attack. Was there more evidence than that for WMD in Saddam's Iraq?

8 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

AaronS

Aug-30-13 12:21 PM

You are using the same rationale that you condemn Bush for when you talk about gassing Americans manydemocrats. Does that make you a hypocrite for calling for Bush to be charged with war crimes?

Also, you claim America was duped. Do you include the Democrats in Congress, including Hilldog, Jay, Kerry and Edwards who supported the use of force in Iraq? If Bush should stand for war crimes, they should to, right!!!!! Anything less you a two time hypocrite manydemocrats.

Are you a 2 time hypocrite or do you agree that Congressman should suffer the same fate as President Bush!!!!!

8 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

manydemocrats

Aug-30-13 9:33 AM

I would remind all of you, that the use of horrendous Chemical Weapons has been banned by the world community. If we and the world's nations stand idly by and allow anyone to kill in mass with these weapons NOW, then you can expect to see perhaps thousands upon thousands of Americans gassed in the streets of Europe and Asia. Do we wait until Israel or South Korea has been gassed until we take action???

6 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

manydemocrats

Aug-30-13 9:19 AM

Aaron, I am here with my opinion of course. I am certainly not calling for Obama's head as of yet. I didn't call for Bush/Cheney's heads until I learned that we {The American People} had been duped into a war for oil and not WMD's. I still believe they should be tried and hung for their war crimes. As for Syria, at this time, I am strongly opposed to our nation's entry into that war. BUT, As of yet, no decision has been made as to our degree of involvement. Unlike you of the Right Wing/Tea Baggers, I will not prematurely condemn an administration until ALL of the facts are known. As for Iraq, Obama after being elected, did begin immediately winding down and ending that war, asap. This administration is faced with some very difficult decisions as to WHAT actions should be taken. The evidence that they have, is yet an UNKNOWN....

8 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 31 comments Show More Comments
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web