Mobile Version: mobile.newsandsentinel.com
 
RSS:
Parkersburg Weather Forecast, WV (26101)
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Business | Local News | Obituaries | Election '08 | Sports | Community information | Ads | Blogs | CU Galleries | Contact us | Polls

Business Savvy

POSTED:Wed, March 19, 2008 @ 1:32PM

Air Force jobs overseas

A couple of weeks ago, the Air Force awarded a $35 billion contract to the European company Airbus instead of renewing the contract with Boeing.

The refueling tankers have been made by Boeing for about 50 years.

My largest issue with the contract is the government is trying to force businesses to keep jobs in this country but they are going to outsource the building of refueling tankers. I know it's not quite the same thing, but why should businesses do something the government doesn't seem to want to do?

The contract with a company in a different company will result in job losses for Americans, something that is never needed but is especially bad during a recession.

Another complaint I have about the contract is I have not been able to find a good reason for the contract to not be awarded to Boeing. Apparently, Boeing agrees with me, because they have filed a complaint with the Government Accountability Office. The decision may be over turned by June if the GAO sides with Boeing.

Security is another concern. It is difficult to do comprehensive background checks on people, just as the hundreds of thousands of immigrants waiting to have their citizenship approved. Is a company in France going to be as concerned with who is working on American Air Force fuel tankers as Boeing may be? I would think the Air Force would feel more secure with the plans being made in a location they can have some control over.

And 50 years of reliable service should count for something when considering a contract. How about some loyalty, Air Force?

I'm sure Airbus can do a good job on the tankers and competition is never a bad thing, but give me a better reason than speculation of future bad performance when choosing a company that will cost 1,000s of jobs.

Member Comments

View Comments: | Post a comment
No comments posted for this article.

You must first login before you can comment.

Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.

Rachel Lane

Staff Writer Rachel Lane is from the Mid Ohio Valley. She has a personal interest in business and investing. Anyone with an idea for a blog may e-mail her at rlane@newsandsentinel.com.

Contact Info 304-485-1891 x315
rlane@newsandsentinel.com

My Favorite Sites Business Week
Forbes online
NPR- National Public Radio
Parkersburg News and Sentinel
Graffiti

Recent Blogs » Politics and gas prices
» Interest rates lowered again
» Go Green
» Taxes
» 150 mpg

» View All My Blogs

Business | Local News | Obituaries | Election '08 | Sports | Community information | Ads | Blogs | CU Galleries | Contact us | Polls