The details are coming forth as I write this, but a true story of Russian collusion is now coming to light. No, not a story of Trump colluding with the Russians to win the presidential election. Instead, it is the story of Bill and Hillary Clinton colluding with Russian President Vladimir Putin to get the Uranium One deal approved, resulting in the Russian government gaining control of 20 percent of the U.S. uranium reserves.

While pushing for the Uranium One deal, Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee, per speech, in the Soviet Union. After the Uranium One deal was approved, the Clinton Foundation received $145 million in kickbacks from the Russian government.

Presently unknown is where the uranium went. We only know the uranium left the country. It may have been funneled to North Korea or Iraq to build nuclear weapons.

It is worth mentioning that an FBI whistleblower was forced to sign a gag order by then-attorney general Eric Holder to keep details of the Uranium One deal from being made public. Committees in both the House and Senate are currently investigating the Uranium One deal, so it is possible after decades of operating above the law, the Clintons may finally face justice. Anyway, the Clintons, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch and Barack Obama may have some “tall” explaining to do.

As usual the liberal news media, which is fixated on the Trump-Russian collusion story, has been nearly silent on the Uranium One/Clinton-Russian collusion story.

Don Geibel ask the question, “Why do liberals blame the bomber for a bombing, but blame the guns for shootings?” The answer is it fits their progressive liberal agenda of universal gun control. Liberals apparently don’t care about universal bomb control.

Why do liberals remain silent when multi-billionaire Michael Bloomberg spends $20 million in the state of Nevada alone to push gun control, but condemn the NRA for spending a measly $5 million to $6 million a year nationwide to oppose gun control? Answer: The usual liberal hypocrisy.

Steve Wolverton